CPO Outlook 2026 EBG | Network

Nordic Procurement Focus

2026 — what is on the table in October

Since 2010, every EBG summit has been built on one question: if you could sit down with people who share your challenges, what would you want to talk about? The answers set the programme. What follows is the thinking behind it — five questions Nordic procurement leaders keep returning to, the articles EBG has published on each, and where the question gets worked through in the room on 14–15 October.

Practitioner pieces and Expert Organisation pieces sit side by side, because that is how the room works too.

New to the programme? Start with what’s on the table — and who put it there, then come back here for the depth.

What is the function actually hiring for?

61%say analytical and operational work both still build the procurement professional

Only 5% are actively building a new development path — while the work that trains the next generation is the work AI is most likely to absorb first. The entry-level question is open, and nobody has to answer it in 2026. But someone has to start asking.EBG | Xperience 2026 post-survey, n=48

Published

In the room, 14–15 October

How much foundation before you move on AI?

29% → 67%save four or more hours a week from AI today — and expect to in two years

The steepest expectation curve the function has published about itself. And when asked where AI adoption begins, pilots (57%) and process redesign (52%) now lead; data and systems trail at 33%. A clear move away from the fix-the-data-first orthodoxy — which does not mean the data question went away.EBG | Xperience 2026 post-survey, n=48

Published

In the room, 14–15 October

Risk beyond Tier 1 — and the map it sits on

Knowing your supplier risk and reducing it are two different pieces of work. The first has become cheaper and faster than it has ever been. The second still runs on operating model, ownership and priority — and on a trade map that shifted noticeably during 2026.

Published

In the room, 14–15 October

Who owns the regulatory work when the rules keep moving?

A regulation tells you what to comply with. It never tells you what it means for your business, how far into the supply base it reaches, what counts as evidence — or who inside the organisation gets to decide. That gap is where procurement ends up, usually without anyone having agreed that it should.

Published

  • Who decides what it means?

    Define it, implement it, prove it — and the ownership question underneath all three. Sets up Alisha Bloodworth’s lab.

In the room, 14–15 October

What to stop, what to keep — and what kind of company you are becoming

77%describe their digital maturity as developing — up from 74% in 2025

Around 95% use AI in some form, but only 2% say it is embedded in how they work and decide. And when asked what slows action, 62% name competing demands, ahead of stakeholder alignment (53%) and unclear mandate (36%). The messy middle has not cleared. Procurement won the argument about being strategic; the argument about what to stop doing has barely started.EBG | Xperience 2026 post-survey, n=48; 2025 comparison from EBG’s 2025 surveys

Published

In the room, 14–15 October

Two days on how procurement runs today and where it is heading

CPO Outlook 2026, 14–15 October, Hotel Birger Jarl, Stockholm. The 23rd EBG | Network summit. Round-table exchange, peer labs and keynotes — you choose the rooms that match what you are working on.

In-house procurement practitioners: 15% off with code LEARN2026, three-course dinner included.